🔗 Share this article

The debated, US and Israel-backed Gaza relief foundation says it is terminating its relief activities in the affected area, following nearly half a year.

The organisation had previously halted its three food distribution sites in Gaza following the truce agreement between Hamas and Israel came into force in recent weeks.

The organization attempted to bypass the UN as the main supplier of aid to Gaza's population.

United Nations organizations and other humanitarian groups declined to participate with its approach, claiming it was improper and dangerous.

Many residents were fatally wounded while trying to acquire nourishment amid chaotic scenes near GHF's sites, primarily from Israeli forces, based on UN documentation.

Israel said its troops fired alerting fire.

Program Termination

The foundation announced on Monday that it was winding down operations now because of the "effective conclusion of its crisis response", with a total of three million packages containing the corresponding to over 187 million food portions provided to residents.

The GHF's executive director, the foundation leader, further mentioned the American-directed Civil-Military Coordination Center - which has been established to help implement the United States' Palestinian peace proposal - would be "taking over and developing the system the foundation tested".

"The organization's system, in which militant groups were prevented from misappropriating relief supplies, was significantly influential in bringing Palestinian factions to negotiations and establishing a truce."

Reactions and Responses

Hamas - which denies stealing aid - welcomed the closure of the humanitarian foundation, based on information.

An official from stated GHF should be held accountable for the negative impact it created to Palestinians.

"We request all global human rights groups to make certain that consequences are faced after causing the death and injury of many residents and obscuring the starvation policy practised by the Israeli government."

Operational Background

The GHF began operations in Gaza on May 26th, a short period subsequent to Israeli authorities had somewhat relaxed a total blockade on aid and commercial deliveries to Gaza that persisted for nearly three months and resulted in critical deficits of essential supplies.

Three months later, a nutritional emergency was proclaimed in the Gaza metropolitan area.

The organization's sustenance provision locations in the southern and middle regions of Gaza were operated by US private security contractors and located inside regions under Israeli military authority.

Relief Agency Issues

United Nations agencies and their collaborators claimed the system breached the fundamental humanitarian principles of objectivity, fairness and autonomy, and that channelling desperate people into militarised zones was inherently unsafe.

International human rights monitoring body stated it documented the fatalities of no fewer than 859 Gazans attempting to obtain nourishment in the vicinity of GHF sites between late May through end of July.

A further 514 persons were killed near the courses followed by international humanitarian deliveries, it further stated.

The majority of these individuals were fatally wounded by the Israeli forces, based on the agency's reports.

Contrasting Reports

Israel's armed services claimed its soldiers had fired warning shots at individuals who came near them in a "menacing" fashion.

The organization declared there were no shootings at the relief locations and alleged that United Nations of using "false and misleading" statistics from the Gazan medical department controlled by militant factions.

Subsequent Developments

The GHF's future had been uncertain since militant groups and the Israeli government approved a ceasefire deal to execute the first phase of the United States' reconciliation proposal.

The arrangement specified humanitarian assistance would take place "free from intervention from the both sides through the United Nations and its agencies, and the international relief society, in combination with other worldwide bodies not linked whatsoever" with militant groups and the Israeli government.

UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric stated recently that the organization's termination would have "no impact" on its work "as we never partnered with them".

He also said that while increased relief was entering the region since the halt in hostilities began on 10 October, it was "inadequate to address all necessities" of the 2.1 million residents.